The upcoming UK Budget could see changes to pension tax relief, especially for high earners. Potential reforms include reducing the tax-free lump sum, introducing a flat rate of tax relief, and possibly subjecting pension pots to inheritance tax. While these reforms may increase revenue, they could have wider implications for pension savings and retirement planning.

Key Points:

  • Pension Tax Relief Reform: The government may limit tax relief on pension contributions for high earners, potentially introducing a flat rate of 25% or 30%.
  • Tax Relief Cost: The current system costs the UK £48.7bn, with more than half benefiting higher-rate taxpayers.
  • Impact on Revenue: Think tanks estimate that limiting pension tax relief would generate only £1.5bn–£2.7bn in additional revenue.
  • Tax-Free Lump Sum: The Chancellor might cut the 25% tax-free lump sum currently allowed on pensions.
  • Employer Contributions and Defined Benefits: Taxing employer contributions to defined benefit schemes would be complicated but necessary for comprehensive pension reform.
  • Inheritance Tax and National Insurance: There are discussions about making pension pots subject to inheritance tax (IHT) and changing how pension contributions are treated under National Insurance (NI).

The Current Pension Tax System

The UK’s pension tax system is relatively generous, allowing contributions to grow tax-free, with tax applied only when withdrawals are made. This system disproportionately benefits high earners, with over half of the £48.7bn in tax relief going to higher and additional-rate taxpayers.

To address this imbalance, proposals have been made to introduce a flat rate of tax relief, ranging from 25% to 30%. However, think tanks such as the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) suggest that even with this change, only modest revenue increases of up to £2.7bn would be seen. The Pensions Policy Institute predicts an even smaller gain of around £1.5bn.

Challenges with Reform

While limiting tax relief may seem straightforward, tax director Stephanie Court from RSM warns that the process is complex. Reforming how employer contributions to defined benefit (DB) schemes are taxed would be especially challenging. Many high earners benefit from these schemes, and altering how they are taxed is crucial to any meaningful reform.

Moreover, the IFS points out that while such changes could shift the tax burden onto the wealthiest 20%, they are unlikely to generate substantial revenue. The current pension system contains arbitrary and inefficient features that also warrant reform.

Potential Budget Reforms

Other possible measures include reducing the tax-free lump sum that retirees can withdraw, which is currently set at 25% of the pension pot. Lowering this threshold could directly reduce retirees’ disposable income while raising government revenue.

Another controversial proposal is making pension pots subject to inheritance tax. This would mean that when a pension holder dies, the remaining pension pot would be taxed as part of their estate, rather than being passed on tax-free to beneficiaries.

Additionally, the government may look at changes to National Insurance on pension contributions. Reforming current NI exemptions could provide another way to increase revenue without fundamentally altering the pension system.

Conclusion

Pension tax relief reform appears to be on the horizon, but striking the right balance between fairness, revenue generation, and long-term pension sustainability is complex. While limiting tax relief for high earners may redistribute the tax burden, it is unlikely to result in substantial revenue. Reducing the tax-free lump sum and introducing inheritance tax on pension pots could prove more effective in raising government funds.

Disclaimer:
While we strive to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information on this website, tax laws and regulations can change and may differ depending on individual circumstances. The content provided is for general information purposes only and should not be considered professional advice. It is not a substitute for personalised advice from a qualified professional. We strongly recommend seeking professional consultation before making any decisions or taking action based on the information provided here. We do not accept liability for any loss or damage, direct or indirect, resulting from reliance on this information. Use of this website and its content is at your own risk.

Hannah Chibaya


>